The purpose of this research is to elucidate Japanese companies’ motives for adopting the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and its effects by analyzing the characteristics of companies that have adopted the IFRS voluntarily before and after the application of the IFRS. Furthermore, to study the effects of the IFRS, we focused on whether the relationships between companies and investors are affected by the change in the ownership structure, that is, the shift from a domestic standard to a global one.
We have obtained evidence that supports the following hypotheses. Firstly, in terms of the motives of the adoption, Japanese companies are more inclined to adopt the IFRS voluntarily, as (1) foreign and domestic investors pay a great deal of attention to the companies, (2) the difference between Japanese generally accepted accounting principles (Japanese GAAP) and the IFRS will have a large effect on the figures of financial statements, and (3) the parent company adopts the IFRS under listed parent/subsidiary pairs. Secondly, in terms of the effects of the adoption, companies that have adopted the IFRS make efforts to reduce the factors that hinder dialogue with investors by decreasing cross-holdings around the time when they adopt the IFRS.
The important contribution of this study is that while considering the context unique to Japan, it has provided, for the first time, evidence suggesting that companies that have adopted the IFRS are proactively eliminating cross-holdings to reduce the factors that hinder dialogue with investors after the adoption. Additionally, this study's contribution to the research into the literatures on the adoption of the IFRS is that it provided evidence that companies are more motivated to voluntarily adopt the IFRS when there is attention from investors including foreign and local ones; this is contrary to the suggestion that has been prevalent so far, that is, that the motive for voluntary adoption was thought to be a response to foreign investors.
The above mentioned evidence indicates that while companies that have adopted the IFRS tend to promote dialogue with investors and try to be in harmony with the securities market, companies that have not adopted the IFRS do not give it significance. If there exists such an essential difference between companies that have adopted the IFRS and companies that have not adopted the IFRS, it is not effective to haphazardly force companies to apply the IFRS, and mandatory adoption should be discussed together with the ongoing reform of corporate governance, disclosure systems, and securities exchange, etc.
View full abstract