Japanese Journal of Radiation Safety Management
Online ISSN : 1884-9512
Print ISSN : 1347-1503
ISSN-L : 1347-1503
Current issue
Displaying 1-10 of 10 articles from this issue
Preface
Original Paper
  • Mio NAKAMURA, Mako TANABE, Taku SATO, Kodai SAGEHASHI, Saki TAKAHIRA, ...
    Article type: Original Paper
    2025 Volume 24 Issue 1 Pages 2-9
    Published: 2025
    Released on J-STAGE: June 17, 2025
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

    After Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident in 2011, a new device called “Beta Panel Σ” was released that can test for body surface contamination in designated areas. It can measure head, face, back of hands, palm of hands and shoe sole.

    Since this device has not yet been widely used nationwide and has not been evaluated by users, we conducted a basic performance evaluation this time. As a matter of consideration, we investigated whether the measured values would be similar using background and radiation sources. As a result, it was found that there were no problems in using it, but it was also found that there were some points that needed to be taken care of.

    Download PDF (3249K)
  • Tomokazu SUZUKI, Shogo HIGAKI, Takeshi IIMOTO
    Article type: Original Paper
    2025 Volume 24 Issue 1 Pages 10-17
    Published: 2025
    Released on J-STAGE: June 17, 2025
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

    Items to be included in the radiation worker certificate were discussed based on Act on the Regulation of Radioisotopes, etc. and the Regulation on Prevention of Ionizing Radiation Hazards. The study was divided into cases in which the certificates should be submitted from an employer to an organization with a controlled area and cases in which the employer changes the organization due to a job change, etc., and radiation exposure control, education and training, and medical surveillance, respectively. As a result, it was concluded that in the former case, items related to education and training according to the radiation hazards prevention program of the facility to which the certificate should be submitted and items required for medical surveillance should include the date, the name of the physician, and the results. In the latter case, it was concluded that effective dose and equivalent dose to lens of the eyes for up to 5 years, education and training in accordance with the radiation hazards prevention program of the facility to which the certificate should be submitted, and the date, name of the physician, and results before entering the controlled area and the latest medical surveillance were required.

    Download PDF (671K)
Case report
Scientific Note
Others
Survey meter
Others
A summary of the 23nd Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Radiation Safety Management (JRSM)
feedback
Top